Comments

1. eric Said,

   hasselblad h3d!
   References :

2. JEFF Said,

   hi my name is jeff and i stole from my dicks purse
   References :

3. Rob L Said,

   If you are giving them out I'll take the Hasselblad H3D please
   References :
   Photographer

4. Chris P Said,

   ohh eee I would take Hasselblad H3D… great stuff….
   References :

5. Pooky Said,

   I think an extra lens for the S2 would cost a "few" dollars less than the H3D.

   p.s. I'll take both, and please make it "to go".
   References :

6. OldGringo Said,

   What do you want the camera for?
   what size camera do you want to use?
   Both are excellent cameras.
   Most of my experience has been with 35mm cameras, so I'd like to try the Hasselblad for large format.
   References :

7. Ben H Said,

   The Hassleblad, for two reasons

   1. The Hasselblad H system is truly a system camera, and what's more a system camera that can go from film to digital without even changing bodies. Based on that alone, it's worth its weight in gold. Well, considering the cost, it's probably actually worth more than its weight in gold when bought new, but you get the point.

   2. Leica's finacial position not too long ago was, at best, precarious. I'd have no qualms investing in their rangefinders, since they have 50+ years of equipment out there. I don't know that I'd risk tying my investment in a all-new system from a company that may not even be around in a year or two. The Hasselbad H series at least has 6 years of equipment already out in the marketplace, and, if I'm not mistaken, can be adapted to use 50 years of V-series lenses.
   References :